Dwarves Over the Years
These are some of my 4th edition models. I have sold off about 1/3 of my collection from that time, mainly from the look of some of the models that I am not interested with much any more and also because of the fact that I have just too damn much of one model. I did not have much in the form of depth on the bench with this edition. I really do love these models, but mainly as character models in my armies. For example, that fully painted handsome devil on the near left, is my thane of pain.
These are the models of my main line army from the 6th edition. I really do like these models mainly due to their functionality and versatility. I will talk about this later but I have no problem with the "monkey hands" that everyone incessantly complains about with this edition. When I got a good hold of them, I really liked working with these guys. From my experience, they fit really well with my 4th edition Dwarves.
While technically from the 6th edition, they came out just prior to the 7th, and part of the joke in Dwarven circles as Dwarves 6.5. I have put these guys together, and I am still rather undecided as to whether they will serve as a functioning wing of my Dwarves. Unlike in the two previous editions, this army is significantly different in looks so much that they really dont fit side-by-side with previous editions. This means that they would have to be a separate army.
Now for the Comparison
The following pics are my comparison shots, rather self explanatory so I will leave the repotage out of the pics. The commentary will come later on.
Now this following pic is one with one of my Romans from Warlord Games, just for laughs. I know that there are some discrepancies between historical miniatures and fantasy miniatures, and that Romans tended to be on the shorter side and thus modeled by some to be shorter, but this is rather rediculius. From my Calculation of the models without the base, a Dwarf is about 4'7" or so. Just by looks that would make that Roman no taller than 5' or so. That would make Napoleon a LARGE guy for during the Roman Times. I really do find that hard to believe that the Romans were that short given that the Greeks were as short if not shorter and they ranged around 5'4" or so last time that I looked. It really does make me wonder if Warlord made their Romans more for 25mm playing initially.
I also decided to do some comparison statistics with my models. I dont really know how to import a table just yet onto one of these posts so please bear with me on this one. Height is self explanatory for the model itself, but I am just measuring top of head gear to bottom of base. Width was from Arm to arm, and if different the widest part on that axis in parentheses. Girth is how I measure from front to back at the widest part of the beard. I also did the hands with or without a weapon in hand in both width of hand and length of hand. All of these numbers are in mm.
Edition: 7th 6th 4th
Model Height: 25 25 24
Model Width: 17(20) 20 16
Model Depth: 12 11 10
With Hand weapon
Hand Lenght: 3 4 4
Hand Width: 3 4 4
Without Hand Weapon
Hand Length: 4 4 4
Hand Width: 2.5 4 4
A note on the 4th Edition measurements, they were the most wildly varied of the three whereas the 7th and 6th are very consistent concerning the body measurements. It is proabably due to me not using any poses that have the arms tucked down in a ready position rather than in a heroic upright position. Honestly I dont think that I can find one of those models if I wanted to. I will have no problem standing by the measurements on the hands, which were eaiser to do than expected.
What did suprise me was the hands being that much different in size, and yet that consistent between the previous two editions. Likewise how different the variability in bodysize in the 4th edition also suprised me as well. What also suprised me what the consistency in the height of the models. I think that the comparison shots show that any variances in height is based solely on the headgear of the models and not on the projected height of the models. This is odd since everyone bemoans the fact that GW has been making bigger models, which includes me on this. Perhaps that this is a Dwarf Thing in that the size comes from a thicker and bulkier plastic model rather than a taller model.
What to Do with the new Models?
Honestly, doing this comparison and subsequent measurements have raised more questions and uncertainty in general than answered any of my questions. When I was putting them together, I really didn't like the general bulkiness of the model, yet when I did the measurements there was not that much difference. Admittingly I only measured a few points on the miniature which does not take into consideration other points that could show how bulky the model is. Unfortunatelly even a milimeter difference can cause a big change in the look of the model, which should make sense on a 28mm miniature. I know that I hate the look of the warmachines that are in this edition in question, and what looks like a monopose of the rank and file with the models does not help out either.
I think that I can kit bash the old 6th edition models for some variety for a Great Weapon that would give me the almost the same thing with a 7th model, but I can actually move the left arm around. The problem is that it is a dis-continued item so what I have is what I have unless I get lucky on E-Bay. Also I saw and I believe still have some awesome looking pictures of dwarfs that were greenstuffed to look like Ironbreakers from these guys. One ray of hope is that I have what looks like four peanut butter jars full of Dwarf parts. One is admittingly my bit jar, but the rest is all new dwarfs. It will take me a while to run out of Dwarves when I start getting them up and running.
The other good news is that may be able to find some 4th ed. miniatures out there that are not as flamboyant and can fit into the unit without looking like a character. Not exactly the easiest but better than nothing. Also I have not taken a look at Wargames Foundry, or Mirliton's lines and see if they match the same dimensions as GW. Bugman's said that Foundry are supposed to be larger, however they are comparing a Slayer to a fat dwarf in the pic. Unfortunatelly I want to see this for myself with what is supposed to be a regular with a regular. Nevertheless, hope springs eternal on that front, and I saw online that Militron does have crewmembers for cannons and Stonethrowers. That is something that I really do want to find since I do lack viable variety in models for my artillery crew. I cant remember right now if Foundry has any warmachines. Even if they dont quite match up, it would be better than nothing for a new crew. I have not been impressed with any other manufacturers out there.
All in all, it is looking worse and worse for the 7th edition that I do have. Perhaps one or two of the thinner characters may pass muster for me, but I expect to be selling my inventory when I get a chance to move them, unless I have a wild mood swing which I doubt will happen. If anyone is interested, please let me know and I will provide you an inventory of what I have.